<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cooperative Democracy . . . And The Flaws of Online Petitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commonsguy.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/cooperative-democracy-and-the-flaws-of-online-petitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commonsguy.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/cooperative-democracy-and-the-flaws-of-online-petitions/</link>
	<description>a blog for CommonsWare and the Cooperative Democracy Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ab5602</title>
		<link>http://commonsguy.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/cooperative-democracy-and-the-flaws-of-online-petitions/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>ab5602</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commonsguy.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I am starting an initiative to correct some of these problems in Michigan.  The effort is to bring online e-Petitioning to Michigan.  Specifically, the effort partially addresses your 1st and 4th point.

1) WRT/ intrinsically addressing one-side of an issue:

Bringing some of the initiative process online will allow a tie-in (mash-up) with online discussions and a general forum for discussion.  Currently, a person signing a petition on a street is not afforded such luxury and is often faced with signing a petition based on non-substantive &quot;catch phrases&quot; forwarded by the solicitor.

2) WRT/ Ballot Stuffing: 

Real online e-Petitions that would have legal standing with the State can be automatically verified against a registered voter database, thereby reducing or totally eliminating this problem.

For more about this project, visit:

http://signmyname.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting an initiative to correct some of these problems in Michigan.  The effort is to bring online e-Petitioning to Michigan.  Specifically, the effort partially addresses your 1st and 4th point.</p>
<p>1) WRT/ intrinsically addressing one-side of an issue:</p>
<p>Bringing some of the initiative process online will allow a tie-in (mash-up) with online discussions and a general forum for discussion.  Currently, a person signing a petition on a street is not afforded such luxury and is often faced with signing a petition based on non-substantive &#8220;catch phrases&#8221; forwarded by the solicitor.</p>
<p>2) WRT/ Ballot Stuffing: </p>
<p>Real online e-Petitions that would have legal standing with the State can be automatically verified against a registered voter database, thereby reducing or totally eliminating this problem.</p>
<p>For more about this project, visit:</p>
<p><a href="http://signmyname.org" rel="nofollow">http://signmyname.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
